My vote would be bitbucket + Mercurial. On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Richard Brown <[email protected]>wrote:
> I'd made the same assumption myself. And I'm sure you're right that it > wouldn't be the option (mostly from the social aspect) that the community > wants to use git and not github. > On 4 Jul 2011 22:57, "Stephen Bohlen" <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think my own assumption has been that votes (here and elsewhere) in > favor > > of 'git' are also a tacit vote for 'github' but that may be an incorrect > > assumption on my part. Clearly there are non-github hosting options for > git > > (SF too as you point out) but my sense is that it would be surrendering > at > > least some of the benefit of git by adopting it as a DVCS 'engine' but > not > > also moving to github (the demonstrable nexus of git-based 'social > coding'). > > > > What do others think about this? Even though technically its possible to > > divide the two choices (DVCS platform and project-hosting provider), is > it > > the case that for all practical purposes we are viewing these as one and > the > > same thing --? > > > > Steve Bohlen > > [email protected] > > http://blog.unhandled-exceptions.com > > http://twitter.com/sbohlen > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Richard Brown (gmail) < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I’m largely ambivalent about ‘which’ DVCS we use. I have only briefly > >> tried GIT (and didn’t love it ... but did love the speed), and I haven’t > >> used Mercurial, so I cannot contrast. > >> > >> I get the general impression (from previous rounds of this discussion) > that > >> the most popular opinion that was voiced was for github. > >> > >> I believe SF can host both GIT and Mercurial ... but I take it (just to > be > >> clear) that most people are suggesting both moving to GIT *_and_* moving > >> the host from SourceForge to github? > >> > >> > >> > >> *From:* Stephen Bohlen <[email protected]> > >> *Sent:* Monday, July 04, 2011 1:23 AM > >> *To:* nhibernate-development <[email protected]> > >> *Subject:* Re: [nhibernate-development] DVCS Rerevisited > > >> FYI, after NH 3.2 goes GA we *will* be moving the authoritative repo to > a > >> DVCS platform. > >> > >> Steve Bohlen > >> [email protected] > >> http://blog.unhandled-exceptions.com > >> http://twitter.com/sbohlen > >> > >> > >> On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Ramon Smits <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> I'm for github too > >> > >> > >> >
