Cremor,
just to satisfy my curiosity,
did you send the issue even to Oracle and/or Microsoft with
the incongruousness with all others DataProviders implementations ?
how they have classified the issue ?

On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 2:38 AM, cremor <[email protected]> wrote:

> In the past few months I have reported several bugs that either throw
> an exception directly in NHibernate code or generate invalid SQL
> queries so that the data provider throws an exception. I have created
> all this issues with priority "critical" because the description of
> "critical" says "Crashes, loss of data, severe memory leak." (an
> exception is a crash at least).
>
> One of this bugs (https://nhibernate.jira.com/browse/NH-2527) was even
> changed to "Minor" ("Minor loss of function, or other problem where
> easy workaround is present.") although there is NO workaround present.
>
> Could you please explain how you understand that priorities? Why is
> something that always throws an exception in a very basic use-case
> only a "minor" problem?
>
> (In case someone understands this wrong: I know that a higher priority
> doesn't necessarily mean that it will be fixed faster. I really just
> want to know how you get to this priority levels because they are
> clearly not like they are described in Jira.)




-- 
Fabio Maulo

Reply via email to