Ah, nice suppositions.
So, for the software you have payed there is no way to have something fixed
and the whole demand is to an OSS project not for a workaround but for
"Critical" issue on two injectable pieces of the game (Driver and Batcher
are injectable).

The matter is that : Ogni scarrafone é bello a mamma soya (Naples dialect)
IT translation: each bug is the most important in the world for its
reporter.


On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:21 AM, cremor <[email protected]> wrote:

> Concerning NH-2527:
> Using a disposed object is against all rules, so Oracle would reject
> such an issue, even if other DataProviders allow it.
>
> Concerning NH-2792:
> I don't know the specifications of DataProviders, so I don't know if
> they shouldn't throw exceptions in that cases. Most likely this isn't
> specified at all, so any implementation is "correct" and Oracle would
> reject the issue.
>
> So no, I didn't.
>
> On Jul 18, 3:01 pm, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Cremor,
> > just to satisfy my curiosity,
> > did you send the issue even to Oracle and/or Microsoft with
> > the incongruousness with all others DataProviders implementations ?
> > how they have classified the issue ?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 2:38 AM, cremor <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > In the past few months I have reported several bugs that either throw
> > > an exception directly in NHibernate code or generate invalid SQL
> > > queries so that the data provider throws an exception. I have created
> > > all this issues with priority "critical" because the description of
> > > "critical" says "Crashes, loss of data, severe memory leak." (an
> > > exception is a crash at least).
> >
> > > One of this bugs (https://nhibernate.jira.com/browse/NH-2527) was even
> > > changed to "Minor" ("Minor loss of function, or other problem where
> > > easy workaround is present.") although there is NO workaround present.
> >
> > > Could you please explain how you understand that priorities? Why is
> > > something that always throws an exception in a very basic use-case
> > > only a "minor" problem?
> >
> > > (In case someone understands this wrong: I know that a higher priority
> > > doesn't necessarily mean that it will be fixed faster. I really just
> > > want to know how you get to this priority levels because they are
> > > clearly not like they are described in Jira.)
> >
> > --
> > Fabio Maulo
>



-- 
Fabio Maulo

Reply via email to