>
> My priority is Maddalena and Leticia... btw if we have to accept "my
> issues are more important for me than all other bugs because these are the
> bugs that affect me. That's just how it works."
> you may accept that, for us, your issues are not so important for the
> project... and that's just how it works.
>
>
Fabio (and others),

He mentions and asks what the criteria for a priority are. I think that he
has e very good point as it is not really obvious.

He says that currently there is a relation defined between a breaking issue
and having a high priority while this is not the way issues are solved. I
think it is important that this relation is not there and that the priority
is choosen by the core developers and with that a reason for the given
priority. This would make a lot of choices very transparent as there are a
lot of reasons for choosing a priority which is a mix of complexity,
affected userbase, change impact, testability and probably 10 more which all
*could* be valid arguments in priority weight.

I completely under your response but that is not the only subject of this
thread.

--
Ramon

Reply via email to