We aren't using source forge for anything either. On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Julian Maughan <[email protected]>wrote:
> +1 > > I don't have a problem with git or using GitHub as a source code host. > However, GitHub doesn't seem as good as Google Code or CodePlex in offering > a project 'home'. Larger projects like NServiceBus, that use GitHub for > their source, often have a strong alternative web presence with their > website. If we use GitHub, I believe NHForge will need to be improved to > become a better project home. Do we have the resources for this improvement? > Maybe not. > On 19/08/2011 3:28 AM, "Richard Brown" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Oops, sorry. I should have read more carefully. > > On 18 Aug 2011 20:25, "Fabio Maulo" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The meaning is: > >> -1 = Do not use the github repository, find another alternative. > >> > >> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Richard Brown <[email protected] > >>wrote: > >> > >>> Is that -1 for github? Or -1 for this specific branch? > >>> > >>> (just checking there isn't something wrong with the import I wasn't > aware > >>> of.) > >>> On 18 Aug 2011 19:11, "Fabio Maulo" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > -1 > >>> > > >>> > On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Patrick Earl <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > > >>> >> So we need to ensure there has been a clear decision on the source > >>> >> control matter. Committers should indicate one of the following > >>> >> options. > >>> >> > >>> >> +1 = Use the github repository. > >>> >> -1 = Do not use the github repository, find another alternative. > >>> >> > >>> >> Please respond on this thread with your vote. > >>> >> > >>> >> Patrick Earl > >>> >> > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > -- > >>> > Fabio Maulo > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Fabio Maulo >
