I just think if the project infrastructure is too fragmented, it will become
confusing. I think we can divide the infrastructure into two categories:
front-of-shop and back-of-shop. I think it is important there is one place
users go for downloads, doco, etc. (NHForge). The back-of-shop stuff - eg
(VCS, bug-tracker) - it doesn't matter so much. That is the reason I raised
the question about download hosting.
On 19/08/2011 6:37 AM, "Stephen Bohlen" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yeah, some time ago (early on in this last attempt at this) I pointed out
that there are indeed two distinct categories in which we're trying to make
a decision: VCS specifically and project infrastructure more broadly (issue
tracking, announcements, etc).
>
> Even if we go to github for VCS, I'm not sure this precludes our retaining
sourceforge + nhforge in the other roles (e.g., as we were already
discussing earlier today re: central hub for downloads, etc ).
>
> Couldn't a move to github for VCS leave all else exactly as-is and be a
(relatively) non-invasive change (wondering....)?
>
> -Steve B.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Julian Maughan <[email protected]>
> Sender: [email protected]
> Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 06:24:45
> To: <[email protected]>
> Reply-To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [nhibernate-development] VCS Vote
>
> +1
>
> I don't have a problem with git or using GitHub as a source code host.
> However, GitHub doesn't seem as good as Google Code or CodePlex in
offering
> a project 'home'. Larger projects like NServiceBus, that use GitHub for
> their source, often have a strong alternative web presence with their
> website. If we use GitHub, I believe NHForge will need to be improved to
> become a better project home. Do we have the resources for this
improvement?
> Maybe not.
> On 19/08/2011 3:28 AM, "Richard Brown" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Oops, sorry. I should have read more carefully.
>> On 18 Aug 2011 20:25, "Fabio Maulo" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> The meaning is:
>>> -1 = Do not use the github repository, find another alternative.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Richard Brown <[email protected]
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Is that -1 for github? Or -1 for this specific branch?
>>>>
>>>> (just checking there isn't something wrong with the import I wasn't
> aware
>>>> of.)
>>>> On 18 Aug 2011 19:11, "Fabio Maulo" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> > -1
>>>> >
>>>> > On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Patrick Earl <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >> So we need to ensure there has been a clear decision on the source
>>>> >> control matter. Committers should indicate one of the following
>>>> >> options.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> +1 = Use the github repository.
>>>> >> -1 = Do not use the github repository, find another alternative.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Please respond on this thread with your vote.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Patrick Earl
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > Fabio Maulo
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Fabio Maulo
>
