I fear that the issue with nhforge-hosted downloads is both bandwidth and metrics-capture (both of which SF does handle just fine for the most part). Is there an (easy) way to capture metrics from nhforge?
People are used to going to SF for downloads and prominent links to SF download pages from nhforge for new adopters starting at nhforge seem like an ok compromise to me. -Steve B. -----Original Message----- From: Julian Maughan <[email protected]> Sender: [email protected] Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 07:18:25 To: <[email protected]> Reply-To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [nhibernate-development] VCS Vote +1 for consolidation then :) That tends to suggest to me that hosting downloads on SF would be a bad idea. If release downloads are to be regarded as a front-of-shop concern (which I think they should), can't we host releases on the NHForge server? The user then doesn't have to be redirected to an unrelated, ad-sponsored page on SF (at the back-of-shop, to continue the analogy) On 19/08/2011 6:56 AM, "Stephen Bohlen" <[email protected]> wrote: > Agreed. I'd posited early on that along w a move to *some* VCS hosting provider we needed to consolidate the all else around NHForge so that all existing deprecated resources could simply point to NHForge as a hub from which links to all else (JIRA, downloads, whatever) could emanate. > > With JIRA remaining hosted by Atlassian, source somewhere (yet to be decided), what other than downloads still needs a 'home' at this point? > > -Steve B. > -----Original Message----- > From: Julian Maughan <[email protected]> > Sender: [email protected] > Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 06:48:15 > To: <[email protected]> > Reply-To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [nhibernate-development] VCS Vote > > I just think if the project infrastructure is too fragmented, it will become > confusing. I think we can divide the infrastructure into two categories: > front-of-shop and back-of-shop. I think it is important there is one place > users go for downloads, doco, etc. (NHForge). The back-of-shop stuff - eg > (VCS, bug-tracker) - it doesn't matter so much. That is the reason I raised > the question about download hosting. > On 19/08/2011 6:37 AM, "Stephen Bohlen" <[email protected]> wrote: >> Yeah, some time ago (early on in this last attempt at this) I pointed out > that there are indeed two distinct categories in which we're trying to make > a decision: VCS specifically and project infrastructure more broadly (issue > tracking, announcements, etc). >> >> Even if we go to github for VCS, I'm not sure this precludes our retaining > sourceforge + nhforge in the other roles (e.g., as we were already > discussing earlier today re: central hub for downloads, etc ). >> >> Couldn't a move to github for VCS leave all else exactly as-is and be a > (relatively) non-invasive change (wondering....)? >> >> -Steve B. >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Julian Maughan <[email protected]> >> Sender: [email protected] >> Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 06:24:45 >> To: <[email protected]> >> Reply-To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [nhibernate-development] VCS Vote >> >> +1 >> >> I don't have a problem with git or using GitHub as a source code host. >> However, GitHub doesn't seem as good as Google Code or CodePlex in > offering >> a project 'home'. Larger projects like NServiceBus, that use GitHub for >> their source, often have a strong alternative web presence with their >> website. If we use GitHub, I believe NHForge will need to be improved to >> become a better project home. Do we have the resources for this > improvement? >> Maybe not. >> On 19/08/2011 3:28 AM, "Richard Brown" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Oops, sorry. I should have read more carefully. >>> On 18 Aug 2011 20:25, "Fabio Maulo" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> The meaning is: >>>> -1 = Do not use the github repository, find another alternative. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Richard Brown <[email protected] >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Is that -1 for github? Or -1 for this specific branch? >>>>> >>>>> (just checking there isn't something wrong with the import I wasn't >> aware >>>>> of.) >>>>> On 18 Aug 2011 19:11, "Fabio Maulo" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> > -1 >>>>> > >>>>> > On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Patrick Earl <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> >> So we need to ensure there has been a clear decision on the source >>>>> >> control matter. Committers should indicate one of the following >>>>> >> options. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> +1 = Use the github repository. >>>>> >> -1 = Do not use the github repository, find another alternative. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Please respond on this thread with your vote. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Patrick Earl >>>>> >> >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > -- >>>>> > Fabio Maulo >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Fabio Maulo >> >
