I agree -- I don't see any conflict here either. Both of these efforts (this repo and a nuget package) are good progress together towards making it (hopefully!) easier for people to submit test cases for issues.
Steve Bohlen [email protected] http://blog.unhandled-exceptions.com http://twitter.com/sbohlen On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Julian Maughan <[email protected]>wrote: > Stuart, I forked your NH Test repo to the NH Organisation, and have granted > you access to it. I renamed it nhibernate-core-testcase - unless somebody > can suggest better. > > I don't think this conflicts with Patrick's improvements. I see two types > of user: > > - those who simply want to report a bug they have encountered using > NHibernate. We typically ask them for a reproduction of the issue, but they > have no intention of debugging NH to provide a fix. Now they can fork the > 'nhibernate-core-testcase' repository and give us a pull request to provide > the repro. Diego's idea of creating a NuGet package is another good idea > that would make it even easier for them to do this. > > - other users who have the time/inclination/motivation to improve NH by > debugging the code to find the problem and provide a fix will need the > source code, and therefore fork the 'nhibernate-core' repo. They will be > able to take advantage of Patrick's improvements. > > On 3 September 2011 08:57, Patrick Earl <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'm also working on a path to allow people to contribute as quickly as >> possible. I've already got scripts for setting up test profiles and >> such. I'm aiming to get it so that people can pull the NH core and >> have a clear path to having a test up and running within a few >> minutes. Since they'd have the core checked out, they could easily >> start debugging the NH source to find the nature of the issue. I'd be >> happy to have more involvement from folks, so I'm trying to remove the >> boring barriers to getting started. >> >> Patrick Earl >> >> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Julian Maughan <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > The NH organisation could have another repo called nhibernate-test-case >> - >> > the naming to avoid confusion with the actual test project. It's >> definitely >> > a nice idea. >> > >> > On 03/09/2011 4:02 AM, "Stephen Bohlen" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Actually, that's a really good point. Let's leave it where it is then. >> >> >> >> -Steve B. >> >> On Sep 2, 2011 4:00 PM, "Stuart Carnie" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I don't see why not. It may be less of a barrier not to have to check >> out >> >>> the entire NHibernate repo just to build a unit test. >> >>> >> >>> Cheers >> > >> > >
