yeah, dropdowns are a no-go. Especially when considering that they don't support mobile at all.
@StefanSalewski: > > Statically typed and compiled, it provides unparalleled performance in an > > elegant package. > > If you check the exact meaning of "unparalleled" you may get: "having no > equal; better or greater than any other". So it is better than C, C++, D, > Rust and all the competitors? Of course it is This is very much about marketing, which you even mention in your next paragraph... > > High-performance garbage-collected language > > As we know, that not all people like GC too much, marketing guys would write > something like "High performance with true parallel executation and optional > highly tuneable realtime GC support" Perhaps we can add that it's optional into that point, but your version is far too long. > > Runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, and more > > I don't like the wording too much, and indeed it is not absolutely clear. > Does it refer to the compiling process, the produced executable or both? I agree, this is a bit vague. Perhaps "supports" instead of "runs" is better here, what do others think? > > Compiles to C, C++ or JavaScript > > As we know, that some people do not like "to C transpilers" one may write > "Support of all relevant backends including C, C++, JavaScript, LLVM and > WebAssembly*" That's just a longer version of what you quoted. > > Produces dependency-free binaries > > Sounds like a big blob: Maybe "Produced executables are small(down to a few > kBytes) with selectable dynamic or fully static linking for dependency-free > binaries Perhaps, but again that's too long IMO.
