> If I had to guess, I think the biggest problem with Nim is its really unclear > approach to OOP.
I doubt that that's the biggest problem. > No matter how much forum warrioring goes on about OOP, the reality is that > traditional class-based OOP (or a reasonable facsimile thereof) is present in > most popular high-level programming languages and (more importantly) > virtually every programmer is familiar with it. Lots of people familiar with Javascript, even the pre-ES6 variant. Go has caught on, w/o classes, and both Rust and Julia have a number of people looking at them. Clojure too.
