On May 28, 2005, at 14:54, jem cabanes wrote:
Hi, Brian,
Thanks for your information. I'll think it over.
jem cabanes
-------------
On 28/05/2005, at 3:04, Brian Ferguson wrote:
Jem, I don't know what you use your Mac for, but I can assure you
that Tiger is better than all the previous Mac systems.
Of course there will be some applications which have complications
but many of these are being upgraded.
Comments here also depend on the machine version being used and
the user who like to really customise it; then you are more likely
to have problems.
If for nothing else you need to find something, then Spotlight on
its own is worth the upgrade. The only stuff I could not find was
on files trashed and emptied out long ago.
rgds brianF
=======
On 27 May 2005, at 6:40 pm, jem cabanes wrote:
Hi,
Well, I don't use Tiger yet, and I'm not particularly encouraged
by the this list...
I think you will find that a lot of the problems encountered with
Tiger were caused by using the Update option in the installer. That
leaves a lot of old Panther files remaining in the system. Sometimes
the code will use the obsolete files because they were not removed.
This causes all sorts of problems. Unfortunately Apple defaults to
the Update option. The Archive and Restore option is much more
reliable - though it requires considerably more disk space since it
retains the original system files in case you need to retrieve
something from them.
_______________________________________________
Nisus-interactive-nisus.com mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nisus.com/listinfo.cgi/nisus-interactive-nisus.com
