Your 2008 solution had in-line compression and deduplication? Just
wondering.....

Data Domain (the company and product) was founded in 2001 (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_Domain_%28corporation%29)


On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Steven S. Critchfield
<cri...@basesys.com>wrote:

> ----- Original Message -----
> > On Tuesday, May 13, 2014 12:08:04 PM UTC-5, Kent Perrier wrote:
> > >
> > > And have it replicated across data centers so that when a DC pukes
> > > on itself (power outage, backhoe incident, act of God, Godzilla vs.
> > > Mothra) its No Big Deal(TM) to business as usual.
> > >
> > > I think the technology behind products like Data Domain is the way
> > > to go.
> > > With RTOs decreasing you don't have the time to pull the data off of
> > > tape. We have a small DDR (3.25 TB of usable space) where I work,
> > > and with our
> > > workload we are storing 16TiB of raw data in less than 1 TiB of
> > > disk. Add
> > > the flexibility for replication and rapid restore on top of that
> > > then the
> > > writing is on the wall for the use of tape for anything other than
> > > an archive tier.
> > >
> > > Kent
> > >
> > >
> > I'd have to agree here. VTL is much faster than tape and lower TCO.
> > We've run a pair of DD-510's (mainframe) and a pair of DD-530's (*nix
> > & WinDoze)
> > for several years now with great results. We're just now replacing the
> > DD-530's with an Avamar solution, so we'll see how that goes.
>
> Heh, I didn't know there was a term for what I did years ago when our tape
> library died again.
>
> We just chucked a few drives in our CORAID AOE device, and told Bacula to
> use the filesystem, but no more than 10 gigs per file. This gave us a great
> way to "Recycle" tapes as we filled the drives up. 10gig was deemed about
> the biggest we wanted to use because even though it was disk, it was read
> as if it was tape, so it meant our data start shouldn't be more than 10gigs
> of reading away. Our beginning of month job spanned several "tapes" then.
>
> Just WOW that the industry is catching up to our 2008 solution.
> --
> Steven Critchfield cri...@basesys.com
>
> --
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "NLUG" group.
> To post to this group, send email to nlug-talk@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> nlug-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "NLUG" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to nlug-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NLUG" group.
To post to this group, send email to nlug-talk@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
nlug-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NLUG" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to nlug-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to