So is the template wrong, or was Sebb's suggestion incorrect?
On 19/02/2008, at 8:30 AM, Shane Isbell wrote:
There is not much we can do on this one because it is picking up
the ${
pom.organization.name} value for the license.
Shane
On Feb 18, 2008 12:37 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 19/02/2008, at 7:32 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
<organization>
- <name>The Apache Software Foundation</name>
- <url>http://www.apache.org/</url>
+ <name>Apache NMaven</name>
+ <url>http://incubator.apache.org/nmaven</url>
</organization>
This change seems incorrect - in fact this should just be inherited.
If it's coming out wrong because of it, maybe the resources should be
using ${pom.name} instead of ${pom.organization.name} somewhere?
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/