So is the template wrong, or was Sebb's suggestion incorrect?

On 19/02/2008, at 8:30 AM, Shane Isbell wrote:

There is not much we can do on this one because it is picking up the ${
pom.organization.name} value for the license.

Shane

On Feb 18, 2008 12:37 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


On 19/02/2008, at 7:32 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 <organization>
-    <name>The Apache Software Foundation</name>
-    <url>http://www.apache.org/</url>
+    <name>Apache NMaven</name>
+    <url>http://incubator.apache.org/nmaven</url>
 </organization>

This change seems incorrect - in fact this should just be inherited.

If it's coming out wrong because of it, maybe the resources should be
using ${pom.name} instead of ${pom.organization.name} somewhere?

- Brett

--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/



--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/

Reply via email to