I believe that the template is correct: the license file should be picking
up the pom.organization.name value. What I'm not sure is whether the
organization name should be Apache NMaven (the podling name) or The Apache
Software Foundation.
Shane
On Feb 18, 2008 1:33 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So is the template wrong, or was Sebb's suggestion incorrect?
>
> On 19/02/2008, at 8:30 AM, Shane Isbell wrote:
>
> > There is not much we can do on this one because it is picking up
> > the ${
> > pom.organization.name} value for the license.
> >
> > Shane
> >
> > On Feb 18, 2008 12:37 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On 19/02/2008, at 7:32 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>
> >>> <organization>
> >>> - <name>The Apache Software Foundation</name>
> >>> - <url>http://www.apache.org/</url>
> >>> + <name>Apache NMaven</name>
> >>> + <url>http://incubator.apache.org/nmaven</url>
> >>> </organization>
> >>
> >> This change seems incorrect - in fact this should just be inherited.
> >>
> >> If it's coming out wrong because of it, maybe the resources should be
> >> using ${pom.name} instead of ${pom.organization.name} somewhere?
> >>
> >> - Brett
> >>
> >> --
> >> Brett Porter
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
> >>
> >>
>
> --
> Brett Porter
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>
>
