I think it's the latter... looking again at what Sebb said, I think
what was already there was correct.
On 19/02/2008, at 8:48 AM, Shane Isbell wrote:
I believe that the template is correct: the license file should be
picking
up the pom.organization.name value. What I'm not sure is whether the
organization name should be Apache NMaven (the podling name) or The
Apache
Software Foundation.
Shane
On Feb 18, 2008 1:33 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So is the template wrong, or was Sebb's suggestion incorrect?
On 19/02/2008, at 8:30 AM, Shane Isbell wrote:
There is not much we can do on this one because it is picking up
the ${
pom.organization.name} value for the license.
Shane
On Feb 18, 2008 12:37 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 19/02/2008, at 7:32 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
<organization>
- <name>The Apache Software Foundation</name>
- <url>http://www.apache.org/</url>
+ <name>Apache NMaven</name>
+ <url>http://incubator.apache.org/nmaven</url>
</organization>
This change seems incorrect - in fact this should just be
inherited.
If it's coming out wrong because of it, maybe the resources
should be
using ${pom.name} instead of ${pom.organization.name} somewhere?
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
