Earl Hood wrote: > MH has been around for years, and if > there were to be monetary profit to made from it, I think someone would > have tried it already (btw, if it has been tried, it must have failed > because I have never seen a MH-clone MUA available). FWIW, Ultrix shipped with MH 6.7.1, and their GUI mail reader (dxMail) is layered on top of it. There's certainly no "mh.tar.Z" file lying around with source in the Ultrix distribution. If MH were GPL'd, there would have to have been one somewhere. I also don't know if this would be classed as "monetary profit"... I'll not enter the argument of BSD vs. GPL licencing though :-) Simon.
- Re: Passing nmh maintenance to someone else Jerry Peek
- Re: Passing nmh maintenance to someone else Richard Coleman
- License (was Re: Passing nmh maintenance to some... Dan Harkless
- Re: License (was Re: Passing nmh maintenance... Dom Mitchell
- Re: License (was Re: Passing nmh mainten... Earl Hood
- Re: License (was Re: Passing nmh ma... Ken Hornstein
- Re: License (was Re: Passing nm... Chris Garrigues
- Re: License (was Re: Passing nm... Ken Hornstein
- Re: License (was Re: Passing nm... Earl Hood
- Re: License (was Re: Passing nm... Ken Hornstein
- Re: License (was Re: Passing nmh ma... Simon Burge
- Re: License (was Re: Passing nm... Scott Blachowicz
- Re: License (was Re: Passing nm... Dan Harkless
