Simon Burge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > FWIW, Ultrix shipped with MH 6.7.1, and their GUI mail reader (dxMail) > is layered on top of it. There's certainly no "mh.tar.Z" file lying > around with source in the Ultrix distribution. If MH were GPL'd, there > would have to have been one somewhere. I also don't know if this would > be classed as "monetary profit"... FYI, "monetary profit" isn't a relevant concern for either license - neither prevents you from making a profit on the product. It's just that the GPL requires that the source be provided. The BSD license has no such source-providing requirement. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Passing nmh maintenance to someone else Richard Coleman
- License (was Re: Passing nmh maintenance to someone ... Dan Harkless
- Re: License (was Re: Passing nmh maintenance to ... Dom Mitchell
- Re: License (was Re: Passing nmh maintenance... Earl Hood
- Re: License (was Re: Passing nmh mainten... Ken Hornstein
- Re: License (was Re: Passing nmh ma... Chris Garrigues
- Re: License (was Re: Passing nmh ma... Ken Hornstein
- Re: License (was Re: Passing nmh ma... Earl Hood
- Re: License (was Re: Passing nmh ma... Ken Hornstein
- Re: License (was Re: Passing nmh mainten... Simon Burge
- Re: License (was Re: Passing nmh ma... Scott Blachowicz
- Re: License (was Re: Passing nmh ma... Dan Harkless
