>> I have no objection to you or anyone implementing this functionality >> (and I don't believe I ever said so). > >No, you only implied it.
<shrug> if you say so. I don't recall ever meaning to imply it, but whatever. >> I am just explaining why I don't >> think it's that important in the larger scheme of things. Obviously, >> you and I don't agree on this one; that's fine. The original post >> which triggered your reply was only me saying that I don't think the >> timezone parsing was anything worth holding up the release on. > >No, it was you saying you thought the problem was all in my head. I've >stated multiple times that I agree this isn't worth holding up the 1.0.5 >release now that it's lagged for so long. And I haven't contradicted you on that, now have I? --Ken
