In a message of Tue, 03 Jan 2017 04:42:19 +0700, Robert Elz writes: > Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2017 15:45:36 -0500 > From: Ken Hornstein <k...@pobox.com> > Message-ID: <20170102204537.c39325a...@pb-smtp1.pobox.com> > > > | Based on what you describe, I suspect what happened is that your digest > | bursting program overwrite your draft file between "repl" and "send", > | and your "send" sucessfully sent the digest. > >I was thinking the same, almost - my suspicion is that the digest burst >and transmit destroyed the draft (as you suggest) and the the lack of the >draft file is what caused Laura's send to fail/abort. By the time that >happened (even if nmh were capable of doing anything rational at that point) >the draft was probably already gone. > >I would suggest using -draftfolder in all automated sending programs/scripts, >it avoids any problems of this nature, but can also make it easier to debug >any problems with the automated script. > >kre
Okay, will do. Apologies for the complaint; I had forgotten all about the automated script (not only that it existed, but that it was running on the machine where I don't usually read my mail, but was using at the time). Laura _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
