If your theta=SD’s will have etas, no need for TS() specification.  You should 
not need to put in the GRD statement at all, then.  (The TG() is to force Gibbs 
sampling in BAYES methods)


Robert J. Bauer, Ph.D.
Vice President, Pharmacometrics R&D
ICON Early Phase
Office: (215) 616-6428
Mobile: (925) 286-0769
robert.ba...@iconplc.com<mailto:robert.ba...@iconplc.com>
www.iconplc.com<http://www.iconplc.com>

From: owner-nmus...@globomaxnm.com [mailto:owner-nmus...@globomaxnm.com] On 
Behalf Of Pavel Belo
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 12:31 PM
To: nmusers@globomaxnm.com
Subject: [NMusers] mu coding for variability in SD

Hello The NONMEM Professionals,

The model requires SAEM.  Is mu coding useful when each subject has to have 
different SD (SDi=SD0*exp(etai))?

It may look something like

MU_8  =THETA(8)
SD      = DEXP(MU_8 +ETA(8))

$THETA (0.00001,0.0413,50)      ;SD1
$THETA (0.001 FIX)                    ;SD2

GRD=TG(1-9)    ;(instead of   GRD=TG(1-7):TS(8-9))

Thanks!
Pavel
<br /><br />
ICON plc made the following annotations.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail transmission may contain confidential or legally privileged 
information that is intended only for the individual or entity named in the 
e-mail address. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
copying, distribution, or reliance upon the contents of this e-mail is strictly 
prohibited. If
you have received this e-mail transmission in error, please reply to the 
sender, so that ICON plc can arrange for proper delivery, and then please 
delete the message.

Thank You,

ICON plc
South County Business Park
Leopardstown
Dublin 18
Ireland
Registered number: 145835

Reply via email to