Bruno, I think your comments belong in the other discussion. This is what I was referring to in that lame shared-state data corruption pun I made earlier, about sharing data across threads :)
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Bruno Jouhier <bjouh...@gmail.com> wrote: > What I don't get is why the word "thread" has become so horrible and is > causing such reactions. To me share-nothing threads are just an optimization > over processes. What matters is the "share nothing" semantics. > > I can understand that you consider threads to be a low priority on node's > roadmap. As I said in my earlier post, the sweet spot of node is I/O > intensive apps and these apps don't need this feature. What I don't > understand is the irrational reactions that the word "thread" generates. > > Bruno -- Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ Posting guidelines: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To post to this group, send email to nodejs@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to nodejs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
