>
> i envision that i will put a standardized, constant index.js in each of my 
> module folders that will do the bootstrap transpiling business quite 
> transparently
>

That's wrong because

   1. That means that additional typically huge dependency must be added
   2. Compiler may just don't work in a target environment.

Once again and finally I'd like to clarify the claim to the core team:

1) require.extensions is an easy way to define custom executables that 
support additional languages, e.g. coffeenode, wispnode, sagenode, etc.
Then coffeenode@1.0 relates to coffeenode@2.0 like ruby@1.8 to ruby@2.0 or 
like python@2 to python@3. It's hard to see what's wrong with that.

2) The above post shows that deprecation of require.extensions just fails 
to solve the problem it's intended to solve.

-- 
-- 
Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
Posting guidelines: 
https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "nodejs" group.
To post to this group, send email to nodejs@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
nodejs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"nodejs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to nodejs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to