Cool, that makes sense. "require.extensions" = bad
whatever userland wants to do = good (maybe) On Sunday, May 12, 2013 5:24:20 PM UTC-5, Mikeal Rogers wrote: > > > On May 12, 2013, at 3:20PM, Brad Carleton <br...@techpines.com<javascript:>> > wrote: > > If I distribute all of my code as javascript, I just don't see why in my > own personal environment whether dev or on the server, that I wouldn't > choose the first option there. Especially, if from my viewpoint, > "coffeescript", "typescript" or whatever is the first class language, not > javascript. > > And you can say it's bad and there are bugs, which is cool, but if you > guys won't support it, I can pretty much guarantee you that userland will > bring it back anyway. > > > This is exactly what he's saying. > > It won't be supported in core in a way that is less buggy than today, it > is now deprecated, and it *belongs* in userland, which "not in core" means. > > -Mikeal > -- -- Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ Posting guidelines: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To post to this group, send email to nodejs@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to nodejs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to nodejs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
