On Sun, Jan 03, 2021 at 09:38:03PM +0000, Filipe Coelho wrote: > Because we, in the community, truly believe in NSM to be a good spec and the > way to go forward in regards to session management. > > We want to push it forward and see it used a lot more, there were just too > many issues when dealing with its maintainer, of course you.
As a long term user of NSM this is the part I don't get. It seems clear to me that Non was developed as a personal project which was then made available as a courtesy to those who might find it useful. As such the developer is under no obligation at all to add features which he considers redundant or which go against its design philosophy. To expect otherwise is unreasonable. If the 'community' doesn't like this, surely it's up to them to develop an alternative. What am I missing here? John
