notifications  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28528 Revise marshalling of the node filter in StartRequestData [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28528 Revise marshalling of the node filter in StartRequestData [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28528 Revise marshalling of the node filter in StartRequestData [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28528 Revise marshalling of the node filter in StartRequestData [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28528 Revise marshalling of the node filter in StartRequestData [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28528 Revise marshalling of the node filter in StartRequestData [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28528 Revise marshalling of the node filter in StartRequestData [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28528 Revise marshalling of the node filter in StartRequestData [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28528 Revise marshalling of the node filter in StartRequestData [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28528 Revise marshalling of the node filter in StartRequestData [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28528 Revise marshalling of the node filter in StartRequestData [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28528 Revise marshalling of the node filter in StartRequestData [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28528 Revise marshalling of the node filter in StartRequestData [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28528 Revise marshalling of the node filter in StartRequestData [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28528 Revise marshalling of the node filter in StartRequestData [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28528 Revise marshalling of the node filter in StartRequestData [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28528 Revise marshalling of the node filter in StartRequestData [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28528 Revise marshalling of the node filter in StartRequestData [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28528 Revise marshalling of the node filter in StartRequestData [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28528 Revise marshalling of the node filter in StartRequestData [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28528 Revise marshalling of the node filter in StartRequestData [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28528 Revise marshalling of the node filter in StartRequestData [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28528 Revise marshalling of the node filter in StartRequestData [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28528 Revise marshalling of the node filter in StartRequestData [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28528 Revise marshalling of the node filter in StartRequestData [ignite] via GitHub
• [PR] IGNITE-28528 Move the start request conversion out of the message [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28528 Move the start request conversion out of the message [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28528 Move the start request conversion out of the message [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28528 Move the start request conversion out of the message [ignite] via GitHub
• [PR] IGNITE-28719 Revise GridTopicMessage usage in messages [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28719 Revise GridTopicMessage usage in messages [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28719 Revise GridTopicMessage usage in messages [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28719 Revise GridTopicMessage usage in messages [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28719 Revise GridTopicMessage usage in messages [ignite] via GitHub
• [PR] IGNITE-28954 Isolate cleaner tasks and reduce disk retention [ignite-teamcity-bot] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28954 Isolate cleaner tasks and reduce disk retention [ignite-teamcity-bot] via GitHub
• [PR] IGNITE-26630 Separate the stripe key from the cache partition [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-26630 Separate the stripe key from the cache partition [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-26630 Separate the stripe key from the cache partition [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-26630 Separate the stripe key from the cache partition [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-26630 Separate the stripe key from the cache partition [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-26630 Separate the stripe key from the cache partition [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-26630 Separate the stripe key from the cache partition [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-26630 Separate the stripe key from the cache partition [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-26630 Separate the stripe key from the cache partition [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-26630 Separate the stripe key from the cache partition [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-26630 Separate the stripe key from the cache partition [ignite] via GitHub
• [PR] IGNITE-28946 Apply class name filter always [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28946 Apply class name filter always [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28946 Apply class name filter always [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28946 Apply class name filter always [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28946 Apply class name filter always [ignite] via GitHub
• [PR] IGNITE-28271 Use the generated marshalling for GridJobExecuteResponse [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28271 Use the generated marshalling for GridJobExecuteResponse [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28271 Use the generated marshalling for GridJobExecuteResponse [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28271 Use the generated marshalling for GridJobExecuteResponse [ignite] via GitHub
• [PR] IGNITE-28953 Init CalciteMessageFactory with marshallers in Calcite tests [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28953 Init CalciteMessageFactory with marshallers in Calcite tests [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28953 Init CalciteMessageFactory with marshallers in Calcite tests [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28953 Init CalciteMessageFactory with marshallers in Calcite tests [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28953 Init CalciteMessageFactory with marshallers in Calcite tests [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28953 Init CalciteMessageFactory with marshallers in Calcite tests [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28953 Init CalciteMessageFactory with marshallers in Calcite tests [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28953 Init CalciteMessageFactory with marshallers in Calcite tests [ignite] via GitHub
• [PR] IGNITE-28790 : Use message serializer to transfer continuous query dto's in data bag v2 [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use MessageSerializer to transfer continuous query DTO's in DataBag v2 [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use MessageSerializer to transfer continuous query DTO's in DataBag v2 [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use MessageSerializer to transfer continuous query DTO's in DataBag v2 [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use MessageSerializer to transfer continuous query DTO's in DataBag v2 [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use MessageSerializer to transfer continuous query DTO's in DataBag v2 [ignite] via GitHub
• [PR] Ducktape remote start [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ducktape remote start [ignite] via GitHub
• [PR] IGNITE-28952 [ducktests] Make the cache level topology validator optional in MDC tests [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28952 [ducktests] Make the cache level topology validator optional in MDC tests [ignite] via GitHub
• [PR] IGNITE-28930 Default field values are lost on remote nodes when a query entity is added dynamically [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28930 Default field values are lost on remote nodes when a query entity is added dynamically [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28930 Default field values are lost on remote nodes when a query entity is added dynamically [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28930 Default field values are lost on remote nodes when a query entity is added dynamically [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28930 Default field values are lost on remote nodes when a query entity is added dynamically [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28930 Default field values are lost on remote nodes when a query entity is added dynamically [ignite] via GitHub
• [PR] IGNITE-28947 Handle recursive CTE planning gracefully [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28947 Handle recursive CTE planning gracefully [ignite] via GitHub
• [PR] IGNITE-28901 Use the generated marshalling for the GridEventStorageMessage filter [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28901 Use the generated marshalling for the GridEventStorageMessage filter [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28901 Use the generated marshalling for the GridEventStorageMessage filter [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28901 Split GridEventStorageMessage into a request and a response [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28901 Split GridEventStorageMessage into a request and a response [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28901 Split GridEventStorageMessage into a request and a response [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28901 Split GridEventStorageMessage into a request and a response [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28901 Split GridEventStorageMessage into a request and a response [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28901 Split GridEventStorageMessage into a request and a response [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28901 Split GridEventStorageMessage into a request and a response [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28901 Split GridEventStorageMessage into a request and a response [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28901 Split GridEventStorageMessage into a request and a response [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28901 Split GridEventStorageMessage into a request and a response [ignite] via GitHub
• [PR] IGNITE-28938 Split MarshallableMessage: a message with a custom wire form needs no marshaller [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28938 Split MarshallableMessage: a message with a custom wire form needs no marshaller [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28938 Split MarshallableMessage: a message with a custom wire form needs no marshaller [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28938 Split MarshallableMessage: a message with a custom wire form needs no marshaller [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28938 Split MarshallableMessage: a message with a custom wire form needs no marshaller [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28938 Split MarshallableMessage: a message with a custom wire form needs no marshaller [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28938 Split MarshallableMessage: a message with a custom wire form needs no marshaller [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28938 Split MarshallableMessage: a message with a custom wire form needs no marshaller [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28938 Split MarshallableMessage: a message with a custom wire form needs no marshaller [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28938 Split MarshallableMessage: a message with a custom wire form needs no marshaller [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28938 Split MarshallableMessage: a message with a custom wire form needs no marshaller [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28938 Split MarshallableMessage: a message with a custom wire form needs no marshaller [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28938 Split MarshallableMessage: a message with a custom wire form needs no marshaller [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28938 Split MarshallableMessage: a message with a custom wire form needs no marshaller [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28938 Split MarshallableMessage: a message with a custom wire form needs no marshaller [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28938 Split MarshallableMessage: a message with a custom wire form needs no marshaller [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28938 Split MarshallableMessage: a message with a custom wire form needs no marshaller [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28938 Split MarshallableMessage: a message with a custom wire form needs no marshaller [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28938 Split MarshallableMessage: a message with a custom wire form needs no marshaller [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28938 Split MarshallableMessage: a message with a custom wire form needs no marshaller [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28938 Split MarshallableMessage: a message with a custom wire form needs no marshaller [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28938 Split MarshallableMessage: a message with a custom wire form needs no marshaller [ignite] via GitHub
• [PR] IGNITE-28790 Use message serializer to transfer continuous query dto's in data bag optimized [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28790 Use message serializer to transfer continuous query dto's in data bag optimized [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28790 Use message serializer to transfer continuous query dto's in data bag optimized [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28790 Use message serializer to transfer continuous query dto's in data bag optimized [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28790 Use message serializer to transfer continuous query dto's in data bag optimized [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28790 Use message serializer to transfer continuous query dto's in data bag optimized [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use MessageSerializer to transfer continuous query DTO's in DataBag optimized [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use MessageSerializer to transfer continuous query DTO's in DataBag optimized [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use MessageSerializer to transfer continuous query DTO's in DataBag optimized [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use MessageSerializer to transfer continuous query DTO's in DataBag optimized [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use MessageSerializer to transfer continuous query DTO's in DataBag optimized [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use MessageSerializer to transfer continuous query DTO's in DataBag optimized [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use MessageSerializer to transfer continuous query DTO's in DataBag optimized [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use MessageSerializer to transfer continuous query DTO's in DataBag optimized [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use MessageSerializer to transfer continuous query DTO's in DataBag optimized [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use MessageSerializer to transfer continuous query DTO's in DataBag optimized [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use MessageSerializer to transfer continuous query DTO's in DataBag optimized [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use MessageSerializer to transfer continuous query DTO's in DataBag optimized [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28790 Use MessageSerializer to transfer continuous query DTO's in DataBag. [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28790 Use MessageSerializer to transfer continuous query DTO's in DataBag. [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28790 Use MessageSerializer to transfer continuous query DTO's in DataBag. [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28790 Use MessageSerializer to transfer continuous query DTO's in DataBag. [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28790 Use MessageSerializer to transfer continuous query DTO's in DataBag. [ignite] via GitHub
• [PR] IGNITE-28946 Statically configured IgniteMarshallerClassFilter [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28946 Statically configured IgniteMarshallerClassFilter [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28946 Statically configured IgniteMarshallerClassFilter [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28946 Statically configured IgniteMarshallerClassFilter [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28946 Statically configured IgniteMarshallerClassFilter [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28946 Statically configured IgniteMarshallerClassFilter [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28946 Statically configured IgniteMarshallerClassFilter [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28946 Statically configured IgniteMarshallerClassFilter [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28946 Statically configured IgniteMarshallerClassFilter [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28946 Statically configured IgniteMarshallerClassFilter [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28946 Statically configured IgniteMarshallerClassFilter [ignite] via GitHub
• [PR] IGNITE-28944 Refactor SecurityBasicPermissionSet [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28944 Refactor SecurityBasicPermissionSet [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28944 Refactor SecurityBasicPermissionSet [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28944 Refactor SecurityBasicPermissionSet [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28944 Refactor SecurityBasicPermissionSet [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28944 Refactor SecurityBasicPermissionSet [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28944 Refactor SecurityBasicPermissionSet [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28944 Refactor SecurityBasicPermissionSet [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28944 Refactor SecurityBasicPermissionSet [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28944 Refactor SecurityBasicPermissionSet [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28944 Refactor SecurityBasicPermissionSet [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28944 Refactor SecurityBasicPermissionSet [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28944 Refactor SecurityBasicPermissionSet [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28944 Refactor SecurityBasicPermissionSet [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28944 Refactor SecurityBasicPermissionSet [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28944 Refactor SecurityBasicPermissionSet [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28944 Refactor SecurityBasicPermissionSet [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28944 Refactor SecurityBasicPermissionSet [ignite] via GitHub
• [PR] IGNITE-28943 Cleanup in SecurityBasicPermissionSetSerializationTest and MessageProcessorTest [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28943 Cleanup in SecurityBasicPermissionSetSerializationTest and MessageProcessorTest [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28943 Cleanup in SecurityBasicPermissionSetSerializationTest and MessageProcessorTest [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28943 Cleanup in SecurityBasicPermissionSetSerializationTest and MessageProcessorTest [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28943 Cleanup in SecurityBasicPermissionSetSerializationTest and MessageProcessorTest [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28943 Cleanup in SecurityBasicPermissionSetSerializationTest and MessageProcessorTest [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28943 Fix incorrect test file name in MessageProcessorTest [ignite] via GitHub
• [PR] IGNITE-27606 Replace GridUnsafe with byte-array VarHandle views in PartitionUpdateCountersMessage [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-27606 Replace GridUnsafe with byte-array VarHandle views in PartitionUpdateCountersMessage [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-27606 Replace GridUnsafe with byte-array VarHandle views in PartitionUpdateCountersMessage [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-27606 Replace GridUnsafe with byte-array VarHandle views in PartitionUpdateCountersMessage [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-27606 Replace GridUnsafe with byte-array VarHandle views in PartitionUpdateCountersMessage [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-27606 Replace GridUnsafe with byte-array VarHandle views in PartitionUpdateCountersMessage [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-27606 Replace GridUnsafe with byte-array VarHandle views in PartitionUpdateCountersMessage [ignite] via GitHub
• [PR] IGNITE-28937 Register core messages uniformly: drop withSchema/withNoSchema [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28937 Register core messages uniformly: drop withSchema/withNoSchema [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28937 Register core messages uniformly: drop withSchema/withNoSchema [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28937 Register core messages uniformly: drop withSchema/withNoSchema [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28937 Register core messages uniformly: drop withSchema/withNoSchema [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28937 Register core messages uniformly: drop withSchema/withNoSchema [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28937 Register core messages uniformly: drop withSchema/withNoSchema [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28937 Register core messages uniformly: drop withSchema/withNoSchema [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28937 Register core messages uniformly: drop withSchema/withNoSchema [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28937 Register core messages uniformly: drop withSchema/withNoSchema [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28937 Register core messages uniformly: drop withSchema/withNoSchema [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28937 Register core messages uniformly: drop withSchema/withNoSchema [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28937 Register core messages uniformly: drop withSchema/withNoSchema [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28937 Register core messages uniformly: drop withSchema/withNoSchema [ignite] via GitHub
• [PR] IGNITE-28900 Control-utility: Add mass query cancellation command [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28900 Control-utility: Add mass query cancellation command [ignite] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNITE-28900 Control-utility: Add mass query cancellation command [ignite] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages