vy commented on PR #3839: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/3839#issuecomment-3206278760
@ppkarwasz, would you mind reminding me why we decided to introduce a new API such that 1. It duplicates quite some logic (e.g., in `JsonConfigurationFactory`, extensions and suffixes are semantically identical) 2. Supported configuration file extensions _could_ be obtained from `ConfigurationFactory.getFactories()` by filtering on `isActive()` and collecting `getSupportedTypes()` *if* only `getFactories()` would have existed Put another way, why don't we add a static `getFactories()` to `CF` and be done with it? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
