[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17439934#comment-17439934
]
Pierre Smits commented on OFBIZ-12364:
--------------------------------------
Nope.
> Incorrect definition and usage of EmplPositionType?
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-12364
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12364
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: humanres
> Affects Versions: Trunk
> Reporter: ddev
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: ofbiz-empl-position-type-patch.diff
>
>
> In the Data Model Resouce Book, on page 326 (or on page 306, depending on how
> you are counting pages), it shows EmplPositionType having fields "title" for
> the position title, and "description" to describe what the position is
> supposed to be about.
> However, EmplPositionType in ofbiz is missing the "title" field.
> Fixing this is a simple one line patch.
> However, additionally ofbiz seed data seems to put the title data in the
> description field, like so:
> applications/datamodel/data/seed/HumanResSeedData.xml: <EmplPositionType
> description="Chief Executive Officer" hasTable="N" emplPositionTypeId="CEO"/>
> This is a simple patch as well (patch is attached)
> But does this mean we would assume that people are putting the title in the
> description field in their local database, meaning we wouldn't patch it
> without some kind of translation system to move the description data to the
> title field. What about those people who are using the field correctly
> already?
>
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
