[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17439934#comment-17439934 ]
Pierre Smits commented on OFBIZ-12364: -------------------------------------- Nope. > Incorrect definition and usage of EmplPositionType? > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: OFBIZ-12364 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12364 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: humanres > Affects Versions: Trunk > Reporter: ddev > Priority: Major > Attachments: ofbiz-empl-position-type-patch.diff > > > In the Data Model Resouce Book, on page 326 (or on page 306, depending on how > you are counting pages), it shows EmplPositionType having fields "title" for > the position title, and "description" to describe what the position is > supposed to be about. > However, EmplPositionType in ofbiz is missing the "title" field. > Fixing this is a simple one line patch. > However, additionally ofbiz seed data seems to put the title data in the > description field, like so: > applications/datamodel/data/seed/HumanResSeedData.xml: <EmplPositionType > description="Chief Executive Officer" hasTable="N" emplPositionTypeId="CEO"/> > This is a simple patch as well (patch is attached) > But does this mean we would assume that people are putting the title in the > description field in their local database, meaning we wouldn't patch it > without some kind of translation system to move the description data to the > title field. What about those people who are using the field correctly > already? > > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.1#820001)