bito-code-review[bot] commented on code in PR #36350:
URL: https://github.com/apache/superset/pull/36350#discussion_r3687896106
##########
superset-frontend/packages/superset-ui-core/src/query/types/Query.ts:
##########
@@ -170,6 +170,7 @@ export interface QueryContext {
result_format: string;
queries: QueryObject[];
form_data?: QueryFormData;
+ client_id?: string;
Review Comment:
<div>
<div id="suggestion">
<div id="issue"><b>Missing JSDoc for client_id</b></div>
<div id="fix">
The `client_id` field lacks a documentation comment explaining its purpose.
Adjacent fields `force` (line 165) and `result_type` (line 167) have JSDoc
comments. Adding a comment for `client_id` would improve maintainability and
align with the interface's existing documentation pattern.
</div>
</div>
<small><i>Code Review Run #ed354c</i></small>
</div>
---
Should Bito avoid suggestions like this for future reviews? (<a
href=https://alpha.bito.ai/home/ai-agents/review-rules>Manage Rules</a>)
- [ ] Yes, avoid them
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
