rusackas commented on PR #44543:
URL: https://github.com/apache/superset/pull/44543#issuecomment-5803975673

   Update: dropped `strict` back to false and just kept `babel-extract` as a 
required check (9c4caf9). #44538 is on hold, hainenber raised the same CI-cost 
concern I had, so no sense waiting on it for this one. `babel-extract` alone 
still closes the common case (the check never ran, or ran and failed) for every 
current and future PR; the narrower stale-status bypass `strict` would've 
closed stays open for now, but that's a shrinking population, not worth 
blocking this on. Should be good to merge on its own.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to