On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 22:25:11 +0200, Jani Nikula <j...@nikula.org> wrote: > Bikeshedding topic #1: How about making replying to just the sender the > default > in "notmuch reply", and having --reply-all option (instead of --no-reply-all)? > > Bikeshedding topic #2: How about binding 'r' to reply to just the sender by > default, and making 'R' reply-all (instead of vice versa)?
I personally like both of these suggestions, and would not be bothered by the changed default, so I support both of these changes. Maybe we could just use '--all', instead of '--reply-all'? The 'reply' part seems kind of redundant with the command: notmuch reply --all vs. notmuch reply --reply-all jamie.
pgpZ32BooFMAl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
