Hello
> Bikeshedding topic #1: How about making replying to just the sender the > default > in "notmuch reply", and having --reply-all option (instead of --no-reply-all)? In id:"87pqn5cg4g....@yoom.home.cworth.org" cworth suggested using --reply-to=sender vs. --reply-to=all (keeping the latter the default). (This was in response to a patch set I submitted implementing a reply-to-sender option (*)) > Bikeshedding topic #2: How about binding 'r' to reply to just the sender by > default, and making 'R' reply-all (instead of vice versa)? Personally I would prefer this but it is easy to customise. However, one more significant choice is what to do on reply-to-sender to an email from the user himself. My patch used the following logic: look at the reply-to, from , to, cc lines until you find a non-user address and use that line for the reply. My recollection is that this is roughly what mutt does. At least for the common "from user" cases mutt does reply-to-one : just to to: person group-reply: to to: and cc: people Best wishes Mark (*) I have a version of that patch-set which applies to master if that would be useful to anyone, and I recently started writing tests in preparation for re-submitting. _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch