Jameson Graef Rollins <jroll...@finestructure.net> writes: > On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 22:25:11 +0200, Jani Nikula <j...@nikula.org> wrote: >> Bikeshedding topic #1: How about making replying to just the sender the >> default >> in "notmuch reply", and having --reply-all option (instead of >> --no-reply-all)? >> >> Bikeshedding topic #2: How about binding 'r' to reply to just the sender by >> default, and making 'R' reply-all (instead of vice versa)? > > I personally like both of these suggestions, and would not be bothered > by the changed default, so I support both of these changes.
I too feel that 'r' should reply only to sender, and 'R' should reply all. Having reply-all as default is a pain. _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
