On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:07:40 +0000, David Edmondson <dme at dme.org> wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:33:58 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin at > gmail.com> wrote: > > I did not follow the rest of the discussion, so sorry if I missed > > something obvious. But why can't we render HTML parts in replies the > > same way we do in notmuch-show (using `mm-display-part')? That should > > not introduce a w3m.el requirement, would use the same renderer as > > configured for show and hence would produce consistent output in show > > and reply. > > Agreed, that would be good. It could be done as a second stage, though.
For the record. I built emacs 23.3 from source and after installation by default there is no w3m module available. Related thing: by default the value of (emacs variable) mm-text-html-renderer is resolved as follows (IIRC): if w3m module can be loaded value will be 'w3m if no w3m is available but w3m binary exists, value will be 'w3m-standalone else it gets some other value (if any). Tomi