On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:36:07 +0200, Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila at iki.fi> wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:07:40 +0000, David Edmondson <dme at dme.org> wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:33:58 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin at > > gmail.com> wrote: > > > I did not follow the rest of the discussion, so sorry if I missed > > > something obvious. But why can't we render HTML parts in replies the > > > same way we do in notmuch-show (using `mm-display-part')? That should > > > not introduce a w3m.el requirement, would use the same renderer as > > > configured for show and hence would produce consistent output in show > > > and reply. > > > > Agreed, that would be good. It could be done as a second stage, though. > > For the record. I built emacs 23.3 from source and after installation > by default there is no w3m module available.
Currently it's broken for everyone. With the proposed changes it will be fixed for some people. Further improvements will, of course, be possible. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120112/47b4fc2d/attachment.pgp>