On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 09:38:47AM -0800, kk yap wrote: > > I'm not aware of wording that says a switch may simply ignore a > > command. The transport is TCP (or SSL on TCP), so nothing is going to > > get accidentally lost. > > We are saying the same thing. I said "there is nothing in OpenFlow > that dictates reliable execution of commands received" and you are > saying "there is nothing in OpenFlow that dictates unreliable > execution". In that case, guess what is the minimum acceptable > behavior? :)
I guess you read between the lines in a funny way. If I write a specification that says "command A does B and returns C" and I don't also write in that specification "command A always does B and returns C", then I guess you would assume that it is OK for command A to do D and return E or to not do anything at all? _______________________________________________ nox-dev mailing list nox-dev@noxrepo.org http://noxrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/nox-dev_noxrepo.org
