On Mar 9, 2010, at 10:03 , Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 10:01:08AM -0800, Teemu Koponen wrote: >> >> On Mar 9, 2010, at 09:20 , Martin Casado wrote: >>> I absolutely agree, this needs to be fixed in the OpenFlow >>> specification. Else, it is near impossible to build scalable >>> controllers who maintain consistent state. The only caveats to >>> consider would be for packet ins (we can maintain the best effort >>> delivery model for datagram forwarding) and potentially flow >>> expirations due to inactivity timers. >> >> Packet-ins definitely belong to the data plane and can be reliable but > > "can be unreliable"?
Exactly. Sorry the typo! _______________________________________________ nox-dev mailing list nox-dev@noxrepo.org http://noxrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/nox-dev_noxrepo.org
