http://incubator.apache.org/npanday/docs/1.5.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT/developers/releasing.html
I'm sure Brett is happy to assist (I have never done a release either...) _ Mobil versendet > Am 06.01.2015 um 07:42 schrieb David Akehurst <d...@akehurst.net>: > > I would be willing to work on the release, but am not sure how to do it. > >> On Tuesday, 6 January 2015, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: >> >> Guys, I'm afraid with such a low level of response to the >> idea of 1.5.0 release we'd have to proceed under the >> assumption that there are no community cycles available >> to make it happen within couple of weeks. >> >> Fair? >> >> Thanks, >> Roman. >> >> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org >> <javascript:;>> wrote: >>> So, any thoughts about the 1.5.0 release? Any volunteers to step up as >> the >>> release manager? >>> >>> Happy holidays everyone. >>> Cos >>> >>>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 04:25AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >>>> There was a number of discussions to get 1.5 out of the doors in the >> last few >>>> months. And I think it even got to the point where it was literally >> almost >>>> ready for it. But then Brett had to take care about other things and the >>>> momentum was gone again. >>>> >>>> If there's a champion that can do the release, I as a mentor will be >> happy to >>>> help with it from the IPMC standpoint. And even if later we'll decide >> that no >>>> more releases are needed - as it might have matured enough or for >> another >>>> reason - it will at least have a logical end-point of its life-cycle. >>>> >>>> So, shall we release it in the next say 2 weeks? >>>> Cos >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 06:00PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >>>>> If you guys think that the state of the code based is such >>>>> that you can do a release I can most likely help get you >>>>> 3 IPMC members to vote on it. >>>>> >>>>> Then we can do one final release and retire the poddling. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Roman. >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:21 AM, David Akehurst <d...@akehurst.net >> <javascript:;>> wrote: >>>>>> How. I'll do it if no one else does! >>>>>> >>>>>> Might even clone the code and release it myself anyways. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Monday, 15 December 2014, David Akehurst <d...@akehurst.net >> <javascript:;>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes please release 1.5 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Monday, 15 December 2014, Lars Corneliussen // Zen < >> m...@lcorneliussen.de <javascript:;> >>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','m...@lcorneliussen.de <javascript:;>');>> >> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Roman, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> even though it "hurts" I think retiring the project is the right >> thing to >>>>>>>> do. >>>>>>>> Not because of the quality of NPanday, but just because the >> (developer!) >>>>>>>> community is effectively gone. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> While I'm still using NPanday every day (1.5 snapshot), it is all >> on the >>>>>>>> same project and there is no need for further development >> currently. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And just the fact that we haven't been able to release 1.5 for >> ages shows >>>>>>>> the lack of a functioning community. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I might invest in releasing 1.5 - but I might also keep saying >> this the >>>>>>>> years to come. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Although for releasing 1.5 we wouldn't need more than somebody >> just doing >>>>>>>> the release with how 1.5 is now. >> http://incubator.apache.org/npanday/docs/1.5.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT/developers/releasing.html >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So if someone volunteers - just go ahead. >>>>>>>> _ >>>>>>>> Lars >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >>>>>>>> Von: shaposh...@gmail.com <javascript:;> [mailto: >> shaposh...@gmail.com <javascript:;>] Im Auftrag von >>>>>>>> Roman Shaposhnik >>>>>>>> Gesendet: Sonntag, 14. Dezember 2014 19:29 >>>>>>>> An: npanday-dev@incubator.apache.org <javascript:;> >>>>>>>> Cc: npanday-us...@incubator.apache.org <javascript:;> >>>>>>>> Betreff: Re: Determining next steps for the NPanday >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 2:08 AM, David Akehurst < >> d...@akehurst.net <javascript:;>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> I would like it to stay >>>>>>>>> I have done some development for it >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please note that retirement doesn't make source code go away -- >> it will >>>>>>>> still be available for you to use and hack on. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Retirement is ASF's way of telling outside world that even though >> source >>>>>>>> is still there and available, the community is gone. Now, as I >> said, the >>>>>>>> measure of the community "being there" could be interpreted as >> *at the very >>>>>>>> least* having 3 active participants since all decisions would >> require 3 >>>>>>>> votes minimum. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Not sure if NPanday has that, but would love to be contradicted. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> Roman. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> P.S. Finally, should 3 active participants show up after the >> retirement, >>>>>>>> reviving the project takes very little time. >>>>>>>> Hence its not like a permanent state of things. >>
