How. I'll do it if no one else does! Might even clone the code and release it myself anyways.
On Monday, 15 December 2014, David Akehurst <d...@akehurst.net> wrote: > Yes please release 1.5 > > > > On Monday, 15 December 2014, Lars Corneliussen // Zen <m...@lcorneliussen.de > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','m...@lcorneliussen.de');>> wrote: > >> Hi Roman, >> >> even though it "hurts" I think retiring the project is the right thing to >> do. >> Not because of the quality of NPanday, but just because the (developer!) >> community is effectively gone. >> >> While I'm still using NPanday every day (1.5 snapshot), it is all on the >> same project and there is no need for further development currently. >> >> And just the fact that we haven't been able to release 1.5 for ages shows >> the lack of a functioning community. >> >> I might invest in releasing 1.5 - but I might also keep saying this the >> years to come. >> >> Although for releasing 1.5 we wouldn't need more than somebody just doing >> the release with how 1.5 is now. >> >> http://incubator.apache.org/npanday/docs/1.5.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT/developers/releasing.html >> >> So if someone volunteers - just go ahead. >> _ >> Lars >> >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: shaposh...@gmail.com [mailto:shaposh...@gmail.com] Im Auftrag von >> Roman Shaposhnik >> Gesendet: Sonntag, 14. Dezember 2014 19:29 >> An: npanday-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Cc: npanday-us...@incubator.apache.org >> Betreff: Re: Determining next steps for the NPanday >> >> On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 2:08 AM, David Akehurst <d...@akehurst.net> >> wrote: >> > I would like it to stay >> > I have done some development for it >> >> Please note that retirement doesn't make source code go away -- it will >> still be available for you to use and hack on. >> >> Retirement is ASF's way of telling outside world that even though source >> is still there and available, the community is gone. Now, as I said, the >> measure of the community "being there" could be interpreted as *at the very >> least* having 3 active participants since all decisions would require 3 >> votes minimum. >> >> Not sure if NPanday has that, but would love to be contradicted. >> >> Thanks, >> Roman. >> >> P.S. Finally, should 3 active participants show up after the retirement, >> reviving the project takes very little time. >> Hence its not like a permanent state of things. >> >>
