Hullo Shiny, I also forgot to mention that how you can tell there's a difference is by running one protocol end to end (for example Reno), and then running the same setup but with snoop at an intermediate node. Then monitor some statistics like throughput at the sink. One of the examples I sent you has an error model for the channel, so you can vary that and see what happens.
The examples also have scripts to compute throughput and some other parameters you may want to look at. It's from such comparisons that you can ascertain whether there's a difference or not. I hope this will help. Kind regards, Nicholas Mbonimpa On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 4:31 PM, nicholas mbonimpa <nmboni...@gmail.com>wrote: > Hullo Shiny, > > Apologies for failing to get back to you in time, I've been so caught up. > > Please find attached two examples running snoop. > > In example snoopns2.tcl, the slight difference in configuration for snoop > is explained in a comment. > > Please pay attention to the source path at the beginning of the code. > > I hope that will help. > > Kind regards, > > Nicholas Mbonimpa > > P.S: I've run this code on my side and it works just fine. > > > > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 3:25 PM, shiny <shiny....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> hi frndz, >> i have added LL/LLSnoop to my tcl script for snoop agent deployment at >> base station.there is no difference with or without LL/LLSnoop. Is there >> any more code to add snoop agent in tcl script.plz help me frndz... >> >> -- >> With Regards, >> John Shiny.J >> > >
