UNCLASSIFIED We have to take the risk and replace him now, no use worrying about who can get us back up if we go down.
IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. ________________________________ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 07:10 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] I am now fully committed to the cause of getting Mick out now. Really don't give a sh*t who replaces him: couldn't be any worse. Think of those poor sods back home who work with WBA fans. ________________________________ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 8:03 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] UNCLASSIFIED A bit late. Funny thing is, QPR would have done the same to us with 11 men IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. ________________________________ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 01:34 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies apparently it's kicking off outside the Steve Bull stand. some sort of protest demanding Mick's head. On 13/02/2012, at 2:25 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: I wish we could see Mick's post match interview. On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote: Should have been 6 From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies sorry, 5 at home. On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at home? On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote: Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. ________________________________ CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and may be unlawful. By opening any attachment, you agree that the Munich Re Group will not be liable for any loss resulting from viruses or other defects. Any views in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the Munich Re Group. The Munich Re Group will not be liable for any action taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon the contents of this message. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
