That's better.  Forgive and forget Rog.  Let's move on an put this match
behind us.

On 13 February 2012 10:21, Rog & Reet <rognr...@exemail.com.au> wrote:

>  When asked if he was still the right man to lead Wolves, McCarthy said:
> "I always feel I'm the right person to do it. ****
>
> "I've not got a message for the fans. I've apologised. That is all I can
> do.”****
>
> He’s said sorry , so that’s all right then.****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *LEESE Matthew
> *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 9:01 AM
>
> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies****
>
>  ** **
>
> We'll be told how devastated they all are but that they're a great bunch
> of lads who will keep working for each other, for him and for the fans.
> It'll be the worst performance of his tenure at Wolves (we've had a few of
> these now, each one setting a new low - how bad does it have to get before
> it becomes unacceptable?) and not what is normally associated with a Mick
> McCarthy team (despite the fact that this sort of shite is exactly what is
> now associated with a Mick McCarthy team) but he's sure there will be a
> positive reaction to it (the most positive reaction we could see to this
> would be for Morgan to replace him). ****
>
>  ****
>
> Poor team selection again last night - in trying to find places for his
> favourite players we end up with a striker playing at right midfield
> despite the fact he's signed a number of players specifically for this
> position. Ward and Edwards were classic examples of one of my biggest
> gripes with McCarthy now - picking players based on their lung capacity and
> willingness to put in a shift ahead of footballing ability (people have
> been somewhat blinded this year by Ward's 'energy' going forwards but as
> pointed out a number of times by David Pleat last night, he's a shithouse
> left back).. There's a need for grafters in the team but there has to be a
> mix. I don't understand McCarthy's insistence on buying players that he
> then tries to mould in his 'graft' ethos - you know when you buy a payer
> what their game's about. If he manages it it invariably makes them worse
> players (Milijas is a prime example), if he doesn't manage it he doesn't
> play them. We have enough talent and variation in the squad to be able to
> put out a team that includes graft with a bit of guile but he insists on a
> completely 1 dimensional game plan based around his idea of everybody
> 'putting in a shift'. It was effective in the Championship, its not
> enough in the Premiership.  ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Rog & Reet
> *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 2:33 AM
> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies****
>
> Be the usual tripe he serves up in post match interviews.****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Marcus Chantry
> *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 2:25 AM
> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies****
>
> ** **
>
> I wish we could see Mick's post match interview.****
>
> ** **
>
> On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote:****
>
>
> **
> ******
>
> Should have been 6****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Marcus Chantry
> *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM
> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies****
>
>  ****
>
> sorry, 5 at home.****
>
> On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote:****
>
>
>
> **
> ******
>
> so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at home?
> ****
>
> On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote:****
>
>
>
> **
> ******
>
> Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence
> to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. ****
>
> --
> Boo! Thick Mick Out.****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> --
> Boo! Thick Mick Out.****
>
>  ****
>
> --
> Boo! Thick Mick Out.****
>
> ** **
>
> --
> Boo! Thick Mick Out.****
>
> ** **
>
> --
> Boo! Thick Mick Out.****
>
> --
> Boo! Thick Mick Out.****
>
> [image: Logo]****
>
> Before printing, please consider the environment****
>
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only
> to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may
> contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is
> waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. Roads and Maritime
> Services (RMS) is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this
> e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of
> the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of RMS. If you
> receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system
> and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this
> e-mail if you are not the intended recipient.****
>
> --
> Boo! Thick Mick Out.****
>
> --
> Boo! Thick Mick Out.
>

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.

Reply via email to