That's better. Forgive and forget Rog. Let's move on an put this match behind us.
On 13 February 2012 10:21, Rog & Reet <rognr...@exemail.com.au> wrote: > When asked if he was still the right man to lead Wolves, McCarthy said: > "I always feel I'm the right person to do it. **** > > "I've not got a message for the fans. I've apologised. That is all I can > do.”**** > > He’s said sorry , so that’s all right then.**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On > Behalf Of *LEESE Matthew > *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 9:01 AM > > *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies**** > > ** ** > > We'll be told how devastated they all are but that they're a great bunch > of lads who will keep working for each other, for him and for the fans. > It'll be the worst performance of his tenure at Wolves (we've had a few of > these now, each one setting a new low - how bad does it have to get before > it becomes unacceptable?) and not what is normally associated with a Mick > McCarthy team (despite the fact that this sort of shite is exactly what is > now associated with a Mick McCarthy team) but he's sure there will be a > positive reaction to it (the most positive reaction we could see to this > would be for Morgan to replace him). **** > > **** > > Poor team selection again last night - in trying to find places for his > favourite players we end up with a striker playing at right midfield > despite the fact he's signed a number of players specifically for this > position. Ward and Edwards were classic examples of one of my biggest > gripes with McCarthy now - picking players based on their lung capacity and > willingness to put in a shift ahead of footballing ability (people have > been somewhat blinded this year by Ward's 'energy' going forwards but as > pointed out a number of times by David Pleat last night, he's a shithouse > left back).. There's a need for grafters in the team but there has to be a > mix. I don't understand McCarthy's insistence on buying players that he > then tries to mould in his 'graft' ethos - you know when you buy a payer > what their game's about. If he manages it it invariably makes them worse > players (Milijas is a prime example), if he doesn't manage it he doesn't > play them. We have enough talent and variation in the squad to be able to > put out a team that includes graft with a bit of guile but he insists on a > completely 1 dimensional game plan based around his idea of everybody > 'putting in a shift'. It was effective in the Championship, its not > enough in the Premiership. **** > > **** > > **** > ------------------------------ > > *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On > Behalf Of *Rog & Reet > *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 2:33 AM > *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies**** > > Be the usual tripe he serves up in post match interviews.**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On > Behalf Of *Marcus Chantry > *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 2:25 AM > *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies**** > > ** ** > > I wish we could see Mick's post match interview.**** > > ** ** > > On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote:**** > > > ** > ****** > > Should have been 6**** > > **** > > *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On > Behalf Of *Marcus Chantry > *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM > *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies**** > > **** > > sorry, 5 at home.**** > > On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote:**** > > > > ** > ****** > > so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at home? > **** > > On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote:**** > > > > ** > ****** > > Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence > to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. **** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** > > **** > > **** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** > > **** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** > > ** ** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** > > ** ** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** > > [image: Logo]**** > > Before printing, please consider the environment**** > > IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only > to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may > contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is > waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. Roads and Maritime > Services (RMS) is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this > e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of > the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of RMS. If you > receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system > and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this > e-mail if you are not the intended recipient.**** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
