Hi,
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Manu wrote:
> > > Well, I have also discovered that with RC1, timestamps are not updated
> > > any more.
> >
> > Could you please give an example? They get updated for me and I can't
> > imagine what could have caused such a regression ...
>
> Here is a test sequence (the access time for myfile still results
> from my yesterday test).
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] doc]$ /bin/ls -l myfile
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 linux linux 7 Feb 15 18:05 myfile
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] doc]$ /bin/ls -lu myfile
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 linux linux 7 Feb 15 11:06 myfile
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] doc]$ date
> Fri Feb 16 11:12:33 CET 2007
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] doc]$ echo newcontents > myfile
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] doc]$ /bin/ls -l myfile
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 linux linux 12 Feb 15 18:05 myfile
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] doc]$ /bin/ls -lu myfile
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 linux linux 12 Feb 15 11:06 myfile
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] doc]$ cat myfile
> newcontents
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] doc]$ /bin/ls -lu myfile
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 linux linux 12 Feb 15 11:06 myfile
Interesting. The same works for me (32-bit, fuse 2.6.3 user space and
kernel module):
[EMAIL PROTECTED] stat b
File: `b'
Size: 13 Blocks: 1 IO Block: 4096 regular file
Device: 30ah/778d Inode: 175 Links: 1
Access: (0755/-rwxr-xr-x) Uid: ( 501/ szaka) Gid: ( 501/ szaka)
Access: 2007-02-17 01:41:58.000000000 +0200
Modify: 2007-02-17 02:02:22.000000000 +0200
Change: 2007-02-17 02:02:22.000000000 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] echo newcontent > b
[EMAIL PROTECTED] stat b
File: `b'
Size: 11 Blocks: 1 IO Block: 4096 regular file
Device: 30ah/778d Inode: 175 Links: 1
Access: (0755/-rwxr-xr-x) Uid: ( 501/ szaka) Gid: ( 501/ szaka)
Access: 2007-02-17 01:41:58.000000000 +0200
Modify: 2007-02-17 02:08:50.000000000 +0200
Change: 2007-02-17 02:08:50.000000000 +0200
The access time isn't updated due to the noatime option.
> And to make clear which version of ntfs-3g I am using :
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] doc]$ strings /usr/bin/ntfs-3g | grep Deficient
> WARNING: Deficient FUSE kernel module detected. Some driver features are
Maybe this is the problem and/or Fedora kernel specific FUSE issue.
> Searching for explanations, I found that I have two fuse kernel modules.
> One came from the kernel update, and one coming from fuse update.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] doc]$ /bin/ls -l
> /lib/modules/2.6.19-1.2911.fc6/kernel/fs/fuse/fuse.ko
> -rwxr--r-- 1 root root 84352 Feb 10 22:19
> /lib/modules/2.6.19-1.2911.fc6/kernel/fs/fuse/fuse.ko
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] doc]$ /bin/ls -l
> /lib/modules/2.6.19-1.2911.fc6/updates/fs/fuse/fuse.ko
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 79376 Feb 14 13:24
> /lib/modules/2.6.19-1.2911.fc6/updates/fs/fuse/fuse.ko
>
> To clear any doubt about the one being use, I removed the one coming from
> the kernel update... with no change of behaviour.
There are a few Fedora bugzilla entries about the FUSE kernel module being
very old but I don't think it will be updated until the maintainer switches
to kernel 2.6.20.
Regards,
Szaka
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
ntfs-3g-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ntfs-3g-devel
