> > > On 11/26/07, Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Fuse developers have quite a lot of other things on their hands. > > > > > > I thought you agree that you should start formally support uclibc > > > configuration, so you must create a test environment for this. > > > > Please don't misunderstand me. I'd like fuse to support uclibc out of > > the box, but that doesn't mean I have a formal commitment, or that I'm > > willing to spend lots of time on chasing down bugs in the uclibc > > setup. > > Actually I'm not sure anymore it's not a pure FUSE bug triggered by uclibc. > If it were something else then more people would see it with other > softwares too and probably the root cause would have been fixed long ago. > But apparently people are seeing the problems only with the FUSE code.
Sure, it could be a pure fuse bug. But somehow I have the feeling Alon is not really doing his best in helping us find what _is_ the bug. Miklos ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ ntfs-3g-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ntfs-3g-devel
