On 11/26/07, Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To the best of my knowledge you are not my boss, so telling me what to > do and what not to do is not guaranteed to get you any results.
I am your user, in most cases it is even higher than the boss :) And as we all know many users had tried and failed, all is required is a clear statement on your part. No fuse for small systems, that's all. This will save much time for people who are thinking of the idea of embedded and fuse. > > But if these configurations are unsupported, please state so clearly > > on your site and documentation. So users will not try to go against > > you... Maybe fuse-lite project will emerge and ntfs-3g will migrate to > > this one to keep up with its userbase. > > You say this as if that would be a bad thing. I think a fuse-lite > project would be a _great_ thing, honestly. No, I don't imply it is bad thing. If you won't support small systems users has two choices, one is to drop the idea of using userspace filesystems and the second is using the kernel interface directly. Well... I am in the process of dropping the idea, as I don't know what else may go wrong, and the fact that you don't support or even test this configuration makes me rethink of the whole idea. Alon. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ ntfs-3g-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ntfs-3g-devel
