On Sun, 2 Apr 2023 at 13:57, Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context <
ntg-context@ntg.nl> wrote:

> On 4/2/23 11:19, luigi scarso via ntg-context wrote:
> > On Sun, 2 Apr 2023 at 11:06, Mikael Sundqvist via ntg-context
> > <ntg-context@ntg.nl <mailto:ntg-context@ntg.nl>> wrote:
> >
> >     If you talk about the math font, I do not see what you mean. Daniel
> >     has worked a lot on his fonts, and they now work well.
> >
> >
> > indeed the body font is not concrete opentype math but it looks very
> > similar at first sight
>
> Hi Luigi,
>
> according to type-imp-concrete.mkiv, Concrete-Math.otf seems to be only
> used for the math font.
>
> > here evince & mupdf are quite ok (evince somewhat bolder than mupdf),
>
> Well, evince displays it wrong (this is an already known issue with fake
> bold fonts in evince/poppler, reported years ago
> [https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/poppler/poppler/-/issues/645]).
>
>
hm, 4years ago, quite old... and this is not a fake bold, this is an
instance of a variable font.
But yes, it seems that evince still has the same problem.

--
luigi
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki     : https://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to