Am 24.06.24 um 14:39 schrieb Hans Hagen:
… the same "unknown script" error as without the symlink, when the
luatex binary is found on the PATH. And yes, "mtxrun --generate
--luatex" worked.
Might it be a conflict of texmfcnf.lua ?
could be ... there was some change between tl2023 and tl 2024 and then
again after the tl 2024 release
and indeed this symlink chain is a problem, hard to follow also, and
afaik a long term side effect of a gwtex / mactex / texlive transition
but i guess you can just install and then adapt the path to your liking,
no need to operate in the texlive structure
Well, I use LMTX from its distribution and LaTeX from TeX live, and
that’s usually enough. I just thought it would be nice to be able to
check MkIV occasionally.
But even if I take LMTX out of my PATH, TL23’s context can’t make a
format, neither LMTX nor MkIV.
I’ll try upgrading to TL24…
Hraban
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl
webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net (mirror)
archive : https://github.com/contextgarden/context
wiki : https://wiki.contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
