Hi Hans
I haven't used \xmlcommand before. Instead I've always used the method used
in the manual \xmlfilter{#1}{asdf/command{xml:asdf}}.
But I guess \xmlcommand{#1}{asdf}{xml:asdf} is functionally equivalent
(syntactic sugar?). Or are there any differences between the two?
Best,
Denis
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Hans Hagen via ntg-context <[email protected]>
> Gesendet: Freitag, 12. Dezember 2025 10:02
> An: [email protected]
> Cc: Hans Hagen <[email protected]>
> Betreff: [NTG-context] Re: XML-TEI : \xmlprocessfile: unexpected character
in
> setup name
>
> On 12/11/2025 9:01 PM, Jean-Pierre Delange via ntg-context wrote:
>
> > \startxmlsetups xml:comm
> > \xmlfilter{#1}{./l}{\footnote{\xmltext{##1}}}
> > \stopxmlsetups
>
> you have a double # here
>
> I attached a solution.
>
> Hans
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
> Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
> tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : [email protected] /
https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl
webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net (mirror)
archive : https://github.com/contextgarden/context
wiki : https://wiki.contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
