Sanjoy Mahajan wrote: > Whereas the "$@" form would produce > > texmfstart.rb "--option=hi there" > > This second form is what you want, no?
Ah, I see. (is that bash-only?) > > which worked fine, I guess since the two versions are sufficiently > compatible. To avoid this problem, is it possible to put the new > version in ~/texmf instead of in TEXMFLOCAL? Although in ~/texmf may > be wrong for others, so it's a difficult problem... Would it not work to simply point the variable TEXMFLOCAL to ~/texmf? Greetings, Taco _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
