[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>>Same batch file, so yes. >>> >>>It would be possible to convert the batch file into a perl or >> >>ruby >> >>>scripts plus a one-line batch that starts the interpreter + >> >>script, > > > Hmm, > > aren't you shutting with 'Kanonen auf Spatzen'?
Perhaps, but the advantage is that you don't have to aim :-) > I have running the standalone-context here on WindowsME. > I have modifyed the original batch-files a bit If the batch file is still functionally equivalent, it would make sense to include it in the distribution. I vaguely recall that I had removed all of the 'smart' stuff from the batch file to please command.com, making it much less functional, but perhaps that is more an indication of how well I know command.com ;-) Cheers, Taco _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
