On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 06:07:47PM +0100, Norbert Preining wrote: > Good. Now that I know this I could track down the problem which was > reported to something else but the lm fonts, namely to a buggy \pm > command.
Same holds for \Omega. Actually, there is something wrong with the fonts; CMR fonts don't seem to be used. Here is an example: See caption for figures 4, 5, 6 etc. These should have a \Omega wherever there's a blank. Also move to the last page, the font rendering for math is far from OK. I am, in general, unhappy with the fonts: http://www.ee.iitm.ac.in/~ee03b091/ee03b091.pdf A similar document made with the old ConTeXt is: http://www.ee.iitm.ac.in/~ee03b091/ee03b091_nice.pdf The fonts render very well in Acrobat as well as have all symbols. This is what I was mentioning. Dr. Norbert Preining (Debian TeX maintainer) writes this: <quote> On Mon, 05 Feb 2007, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > OK, so it's the \pm stuff. But I am still not exactly happy with the > way the fonts come in Acrobat. The characters look somewhat nicer even Well, this is the switch to lmodern in all the fonts. Your (ee03b091_nice.pdf) document has these fonts: QGWSVP+CMR10 Type 1C yes yes no 10 0 GLMABO+CMCSC10 Type 1C yes yes no 8 0 KOSSLE+CMBX10 Type 1C yes yes no 12 0 TBOINI+CMR7 Type 1C yes yes no 29 0 IGJFUT+CMMI5 Type 1C yes yes no 27 0 YFUUGZ+CMSY7 Type 1C yes yes no 25 0 SZFXRB+CMMI7 Type 1C yes yes no 23 0 MXALVP+CMSY10 Type 1C yes yes no 21 0 KJSMVL+CMMI10 Type 1C yes yes no 19 0 DZLVPI+CMTT8 Type 1C yes yes no 53 0 KRZXUD+CMTT10 Type 1C yes yes no 65 0 while the new one ships: KOSSLE+LMRoman10-Bold Type 1C yes yes no 13 0 KHXVKD+LMRoman10-Regular Type 1C yes yes no 11 0 GLMABO+LMRoman10-CapsRegular Type 1C yes yes no 9 0 XJFWIW+CMR10 Type 1C yes yes no 25 0 VUKLKL+LMMathSymbols10-Italic Type 1C yes yes no 23 0 OPSIHW+LMMathItalic10-Italic Type 1C yes yes no 21 0 TBOINI+CMR7 Type 1C yes yes no 33 0 IGJFUT+LMMathItalic5-Italic Type 1C yes yes no 31 0 LLFODD+LMMathSymbols7-Italic Type 1C yes yes no 29 0 SZFXRB+LMMathItalic7-Italic Type 1C yes yes no 27 0 DZLVPI+LMTypewriter8-Regular Type 1C yes yes no 62 0 Complain to ConTeXt about this switch, or ask them to support the cmr fonts. This is probaly the only way to go. <unquote> So, what is the suggestion? Thanks. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
